View source

From The Space Library

You do not have permission to edit pages, for the following reasons:

• This page has been locked to prevent editing.
• The action you have requested is limited to users in one of the groups Sysops, trusted. Please choose a subscription type:
  Subscription #1 - One Month - $5:
  
  Subscription #2 - One Year - $50:
  
  

You can view and copy the source of this page:

Venus is devoid of water and, therefore, of life, Dr. Gerard P. Kuiper, Univ. of Arizona Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, told New York Times reporter Richard D. Lyons in a telephone interview. `We now know that Venus is a dead planet. The astronomical literature is full of references to water clouds and ice crystals. These two things are definitely wrong. The complete absence of water means that the chemistry of Venus is totally different from the chemistry here." Practical absence of water in the Venus atmosphere provided new information on the constitution of the planet, Dr. Kuiper said: "It is probable now that the Venus clouds are dust and that a substantial fraction of the high surface temperature must be attributed to internal heat reaching the planet's surface through a thin solid crust." Dr. Kuiper's conclusions were based on astronomical observations made May 13 from a specially fitted NASA-owned Convair 990 jet aircraft which flew at 37,000-ft altitude over Canada. His theory conflicted with one set forth in 1966 by Johns Hopkins Univ. astrophysicists Drs. William Plummer and John Strong that surface temperatures of Venus were low enough to support life in certain areas. ''(Lyons, NYT, 5/28/67,21)'' The frontier of space is limited only by man's "ability to maintain individual freedom and yet join many minds in concerted action," NASA Administrator [[James E. Webb]] said at the Celebration of The Prelude to Independence in Williamsburg, Va. "It is the essential requirement for each of us to do what we can as individuals and as groups to make our system of representative government work, and then work better. More and more this means that each of us must find a way to reach through complexity and organized prejudice to trusted sources of information and organized facts. We must not do less than to make sure we understand the fundamentals in the many important disciplines of human activity. Without this understanding of at least the fundamentals . . . today's citizen cannot play the role only he can play in representative society, cannot bridge the gap from the old to the new, from one discipline to another. Without this capability, a citizen today cannot be a fully effective participant in a free society. Indeed, without this basic understanding on a large scale at all levels our nation is likely to forfeit the capability of collectively responsible action, and with it, the basis for an effective free society. . . ." ''(Text)'' NASA Administrator [[James E. Webb]] had been encountering a "storm of criticism" since the Jan. 27 Apollo accident, but "odds are he'll see his job through," Business Week concluded in an article summarizing Webb's career. It noted some of Webb's accomplishments as NASA Administrator: ". . . Webb has steered steadily growing budgets-from $1-billion in 1961 to this year's $5-billion-among the Congressional reefs. He runs a NASA organization of nearly 35,000 people in 16 facilities that stretch from Boston to [[Cape Kennedy]], from Houston to the West Coast-and a worldwide network of tracking stations. At the same time, he has had to deal directly or indirectly with nearly 21,000 contracting companies, which employ about 400,000 people. . . ." Article concluded that Webb had been "bruised, not beaten" by the controversy surrounding the Apollo accident. ". . . odds-makers in Washington are betting that when the smoke clears Webb will emerge still at the helm of NASA. Further, they think NASA still may meet its deadline of a moon landing before 1970." ''(B Wk, 5/27/67, 71-7)'' *[[May 1967|May]] [[May 1 1967|1]] [[May 2 1967|2]] [[May 3 1967|3]] [[May 4 1967|4]] [[May 5 1967|5]] [[May 6 1967|6]] [[May 7 1967|7]] [[May 8 1967|8]] [[May 9 1967|9]] [[May 10 1967|10]] [[May 11 1967|11]] [[May 12 1967|12]] [[May 13 1967|13]] [[May 14 1967|14]] [[May 15 1967|15]] [[May 16 1967|16]] [[May 17 1967|17]] [[May 18 1967|18]] [[May 19 1967|19]] [[May 20 1967|20]] [[May 21 1967|21]] [[May 22 1967|22]] [[May 23 1967|23]] [[May 24 1967|24]] [[May 25 1967|25]] [[May 26 1967|26]] [[May 27 1967|27]] [[May 28 1967|28]] [[May 29 1967|29]] [[May 30 1967|30]] [[May 31 1967|31]] *[[June 1967|June]]

Return to May 27 1967.