Oct 13 1986

From The Space Library

Revision as of 01:27, 19 February 2010 by RobertG (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision (diff) | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

A panel of scientists and engineers, established at the behest of the Rogers Commission, endorsed NASA's redesign of the Shuttle's solid rocket, but urged the Agency to increase its test schedule and to consider alter-native designs. NASA's efforts had been limited by confining any redesign to plans that incorporated the rocket segments already ordered before the Challenger accident. Because the chosen design could prove inadequate and because NASA would begin investigating second generation booster rockets, all alternative design changes, the panel concluded, were in need of study. (P Inq, Oct 14/86; W Post, Oct 14/86; NY Times, Oct 14/86)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31